evolutionary rescue

Wilson BA, Pennings PS & Petrov DA 2017 Soft selective sweeps in evolutionary rescue. Genetics 205:1573-1586.

  • (Wilson et al. 2014)
  • we had assumed that demography was independent of the allelic state at the locus under selection
  • an assumption that is valid only under models where fitness advantages are relative and density independent
  • (e.g., the standard Wright–Fisher model with selection or the Moran model)
  • in this article, we allow adaptation to influence demography
  • fitness advantages are absolute and density dependent within the context of an evolutionary rescue scenario
  • when rescue is likely to occur, it is more likely to occur via soft selective sweeps than hard selective sweeps
  • this result follows intuitively from the observation that the higher the time-averaged input of adaptive mutations, the greater the probability of evolutionary rescue as well as the probability of soft selective sweeps
  • our results highlight a key correlation between genetic diversity following evolutionary rescue and the likelihood of evolutionary rescue
  • there are no adaptive mutations present as standing genetic variation
  • the wild-type population size can be deterministically approximated by w(t) = w0exp(−αt)
  • α = dwbw
  • Orr and Unckless (2008) found the probability of evolutionary rescue to be approximately twofold higher for wild-type populations that experience logistic population regulation rather than the strictly exponential decline
  • we will focus strictly on the case of exponential decline for model simplicity
  • the decline in the wild-type population means that adaptation will eventually be mutation limited in all cases
  • the hallmark of a soft selective sweep is that multiple lineages are preserved after selection
  • selection need not remove all genetic diversity in a population following evolutionary rescue, especially when rescue is expected to be common
  • adaptive mutants are absent at the onset of an environmental shift
  • they are strongly deleterious in the prior environment, as can be the case in resistance evolution
  • when rescue is likely, more adaptive mutants are expected to be involved
  • we expect soft sweeps to be a general feature of evolutionary rescue in situations where it is most likely to occur
  • in cases where extinction is likely, evolutionary rescue (should it occur) will occur via hard selective sweeps
  • we have not considered any neutral loci in the genome, whether linked to the selected locus or not
  • whether a selective sweep in a rescued population can be detected is a question that deserves separate treatment
  • selective sweeps will be very hard to detect if the population as a whole goes through a severe bottleneck
  • in rescued populations, hard sweeps may be harder to detect than soft sweeps
  • hard sweeps tend to occur when the population bottleneck is more severe