evolutionary rescue
Wilson BA, Pennings PS & Petrov DA 2017 Soft selective sweeps in evolutionary rescue. Genetics 205:1573-1586.
- (Wilson et al. 2014)
- we had assumed that demography was independent of the allelic state at the locus under selection
- an assumption that is valid only under models where fitness advantages are relative and density independent
- (e.g., the standard Wright–Fisher model with selection or the Moran model)
- in this article, we allow adaptation to influence demography
- fitness advantages are absolute and density dependent within the context of an evolutionary rescue scenario
- when rescue is likely to occur, it is more likely to occur via soft selective sweeps than hard selective sweeps
- this result follows intuitively from the observation that the higher the time-averaged input of adaptive mutations, the greater the probability of evolutionary rescue as well as the probability of soft selective sweeps
- our results highlight a key correlation between genetic diversity following evolutionary rescue and the likelihood of evolutionary rescue
- there are no adaptive mutations present as standing genetic variation
- the wild-type population size can be deterministically approximated by w(t) = w0exp(−αt)
- α = dw − bw
- Orr and Unckless (2008) found the probability of evolutionary rescue to be approximately twofold higher for wild-type populations that experience logistic population regulation rather than the strictly exponential decline
- we will focus strictly on the case of exponential decline for model simplicity
- the decline in the wild-type population means that adaptation will eventually be mutation limited in all cases
- the hallmark of a soft selective sweep is that multiple lineages are preserved after selection
- selection need not remove all genetic diversity in a population following evolutionary rescue, especially when rescue is expected to be common
- adaptive mutants are absent at the onset of an environmental shift
- they are strongly deleterious in the prior environment, as can be the case in resistance evolution
- when rescue is likely, more adaptive mutants are expected to be involved
- we expect soft sweeps to be a general feature of evolutionary rescue in situations where it is most likely to occur
- in cases where extinction is likely, evolutionary rescue (should it occur) will occur via hard selective sweeps
- we have not considered any neutral loci in the genome, whether linked to the selected locus or not
- whether a selective sweep in a rescued population can be detected is a question that deserves separate treatment
- selective sweeps will be very hard to detect if the population as a whole goes through a severe bottleneck
- in rescued populations, hard sweeps may be harder to detect than soft sweeps
- hard sweeps tend to occur when the population bottleneck is more severe