twin studies

Evans DM, Gillespie NA & Martin NG 2002 Biometrical genetics. Biol Psychol 61:33-51.

  • twin studies
  • dominant genetic and common environmental components of variance cannot be estimated simultaneously
  • these components are negatively confounded in a study of twins reared together
  • genetic dominance acts to inflate the correlation between MZ twins relative to the correlation between DZ twins
  • common environmental effects inflate the correlation between DZ twins relative to the correlation between MZ twins
  • when the correlation between MZ twins is less than twice the DZ correlation, we estimate σC2 and assume that genetic dominance is absent
  • conversely when the MZ correlation is more than twice the DZ correlation we estimate σD2 and assume that σC2 is zero
  • twins differ from singletons in several important aspects
  • results derived from twin studies do not generalize to the rest of the population
  • most of these studies have examined young twins, and have not matched twins with singletons in terms of genetic or environmental backgrounds
  • a number of studies comparing older twins with singletons have failed to find differences in physical characteristics, cognitive abilities or in the prevalence of many adult diseases, suggesting that any differences between twins and singletons are 'washed out' early in development
  • the other major assumption of the classical twin study is the 'Equal Environments Assumption' that MZ twin pairs experience the same degree of environmental similarity as DZ twin pairs
  • there is strong evidence that MZ twins are treated more similarly than their DZ counterparts
  • it is questionable whether this environmental similarity causes increased phenotypic concordance
  • factors precluding a simple decomposition of the phenotypic variance
  • gene-environment interaction
  • gene-environment correlation
  • assortative mating