missing heritability

Hemani G, Knott S & Haley C 2013 An evolutionary perspective on epistasis and the missing heritability. PLoS Genet 9:e1003295.

  • one reason that the problem of the "missing heritability" arises is because the additive genetic variation that is estimated to be contributing to the variance of a trait will most likely be an artefact of the non-additive variance that can be maintained over evolutionary time
  • even a small reduction in linkage disequilibrium between causal variants and observed SNPs rapidly erodes estimates of epistatic variance, leading to an inflation in the perceived importance of additive effects
  • the perception of independent additive effects comprising the majority of the genetic architecture of complex traits is biased upwards
  • the search for causal variants in complex traits under selection is potentially underpowered by parameterising for additive effects alone
  • the detection of causal variants through genome-wide association studies may be improved by searching for epistatic effects explicitly
  • epistatic interactions can allow deleterious mutations to persist under selection
  • these interactions can abate the depletion of additive genetic variation
  • a much larger element of non-additive genetic variance is maintained
  • the heritability estimated from family studies could be a mixture of both additive and non-additive components
  • searching directly for epistatic effects greatly improves the discovery of variants under selection, despite the multiple testing penalty being much larger
  • common practices in genome-wide association studies could lead to both an ascertainment bias in detecting additive effects and a confirmation bias in perceiving that most of the genetic variance is additive
  • traits under selection often evolve more slowly than expected
  • contrary to expectation, genetic variation is maintained under selection
  • this problem is known as 'stasis'
  • it is particularly evident in fitness-related traits where the genetic variation tends to be highest
  • yet there is commonly no observed response to selection at all
  • by definition epistasis will form a part of the 'unknown heritability'
  • epistatic interactions could also contribute to h2 estimates
  • this could arise through two possible mechanisms
  • firstly by generating real additive variation as marginal effects from higher order genetic interactions
  • secondly by creating a statistical illusion of additive variance through confounding between non-additive and common environment effects in twin study based estimates
  • at the intermediate, within-population level there is a distinct lack of evidence for any widespread importance of epistasis arising from natural variation
  • most genetic variation appears to be additive
  • for many of the patterns of epistasis that we assayed, deleterious effects can be maintained at intermediate frequencies over long evolutionary time periods
  • a small amount of additive variation is maintained by epistasis but most genetic variation is non-additive
  • there is a strong bias in GWA studies that lead to an overestimation of additive effects at QTLs
  • perhaps counterintuitively, the most powerful way to uncover additive variation under selection is to parameterise the search to include epistatic effects using dense genotype information
  • because additive variance decays linearly with LD [46], at low LD they remain detectable leading to an ascertainment bias for additive vs non-additive effects
  • even in the best case scenario, where G-P maps were generated to maximise additive variance, total genetic variance was mostly composed of non-additive components
  • this finding is in disagreement with a recent study [28], which showed that for various two-locus epistatic models, the deterministic partitions of genetic variance calculated across different frequency distributions were largely comprised of the additive component
  • those allele frequencies at which additive variance is high (a large proportion of the frequency spectrum), are evolutionarily unstable
  • should epistatic variants be affecting fitness traits then the majority of the variance will be non-additive