pleiotropy

Martin G & Lenormand T 2006 A general multivariate extension of Fisher's geometrical model and the distribution of mutation fitness effects across species. Evolution 60:893-907.

  • there may be a cost to phenotypic complexity although much weaker than previously suggested by earlier theoretical works
  • the distribution of mutation phenotypic effects is also often assumed to be Gaussian
  • we will use this assumption too
  • a perhaps stronger assumption of Fisher's model is that a single mutation can potentially affect all the phenotypic traits of the organism
  • universal pleiotropy
  • Fisher's model only requires a description of the net phenotypic effect of all mutations averaged over modules and can thus accommodate modularity or partial pleiotropy
  • given appropriate scaling, it is possible to account for some correlations between traits
  • such scaling can only be performed for either selection, or mutation effects, not for both
  • Waxman and Welch (2005) have proposed the first model to account for selective interactions between traits, but still neglecting mutational correlations
  • one of the aims of this paper is to relax the symmetry assumptions for both mutation and selection
  • we use a Gaussian distribution of mutation phenotypic effects
  • this model of multivariate stabilizing selection and mutation is similar to that introduced by Zhang and Hill (2003) for the study of mutation-selection balance on a quantitative trait, but extended to account for beneficial mutations
  • S is the n × n matrix of the selective effects of all traits
  • diagonal elements in S measure the selection intensity on each trait
  • nondiagonal elements measure selective interactions between trait pairs
  • the distribution of mutant phenotypes around zo is multivariate Gaussian with mean zero and covariance matrix M
  • the model allows both for differences in mutational variances across traits and for mutational correlations between traits
  • we chose the negative gamma distribution because it is the exact distribution of s corresponding to the simplest situation
  • when all λi = λ are equal and so = 0, ƒ(s) is a negative gamma distribution with scale λ and shape n / 2
  • ne is the effective number of traits
  • when the initial genotype is away from the optimum (so > 0), we use a similar approximation as above
  • ƒ(s) becomes a "displaced gamma"
  • the sum of a negative gamma and the constant so
  • s = so − γ, where γ is approximately gamma distributed with scale α and shape β
  • it is ne, not n, that determines the rate of adaptation
  • including heterogeneity between traits greatly reduces the cost of complexity by reducing the effective number of traits ne
  • the effective number of dimensions ne increases with complexity as predicted by our model, but varies only by an order of magnitude from bacteria to fruit flies, and remains very small (0.2—2.5)
  • the Fisher-Orr geometric approach may not be as unrealistic as it is sometimes suggested, provided phenotypic correlations are accounted for