near neutrality & compensatory evolution

Ohta T 1974 Mutational pressure as the main cause of molecular evolution and polymorphism. Nature 252:351-354.

  • it becomes increasingly necessary to re-examine evolutionary theories
  • in particular the orthodox neo-Darwinian view that the rate and direction of evolution are determined almost exclusively by positive natural selection
  • it is probable that molecular evolution proceeds essentially by mutational pressure rather than by positive Darwinian selection
  • this view is essentially an extension of the neutral mutation-random drift hypothesis of Kimura1 and King and Jukes2
  • and takes into account the idea of "frozen accidents" proposed by Crick21 and Ohno22
  • once the structure and function of a molecule are determined in the course of evolution, natural selection acts mainly to maintain them
  • because all later evolutionary changes proceed under selective constraints
  • natural selection then becomes mostly 'negative'
  • positive Darwinian selection is only a minor part of both total selection and the total number of mutant substitutions
  • if selection pressure is weak, a mutant allele, even if slightly deleterious, can occasionally replace the original allele by random drift
  • such chance events are likely to be important in molecular evolution
  • I have suggested before that the coupled base substitutions in the paired region of this molecule, in the course of evolution, represent a very slightly deleterious base substitution in the first stage
  • followed by a slightly advantageous complementary base substitution
  • this corresponds to Fitch's concomitantly variable codons (covarions)
  • the majority of "nearly neutral" mutations is likely to be very slightly deleterious
  • especially if the proteins and biochemical pathways are very highly organised
  • and if environmental factors cannot interact directly with the primary structure of proteins
  • the present hypothesis differs from the original neutral mutation-random drift hypothesis in emphasising a very small selection pressure
  • in fact, it is an extended form of neutral theory, conceived as the lower limit of the selective process
  • there should be no distinct borderline between deleterious and neutral, between deleterious and advantageous, or even between deleterious and overdominant mutations
  • random genetic drift and mutational pressure play a much bigger part than has been believed
  • we have already suggested from a comparison of actual observations with the results of our simulation experiments assuming stepwise production of neutral alleles, that there are more rare alleles than predicted form the strictly neutral hypothesis
  • if we bring very slight negative selection into the model, the discrepancy between the observation and the simulation should disappear completely
  • the recent analysis of Yamazaki and Maruyama42 needs re-examination in the light of this
  • if the borderline cases between slightly deleterious and completely neutral mutations are important, as I assume here, then the population size becomes most crucial and the rate of evolution is higher in small populations
  • the true pattern of molecular evolution and variation can only emerge from further investigation
  • bearing in mind particularly the importance of intra-molecular organisation which derives from the polypeptide folding mechanism
  • here ecological conditions are likely to be much less significant than has traditionally been supposed
  • in the light of such considerations, the original concept of the integrated gene pool54 may have to be modified
  • the distinction between the strict neutral theory and my theory should be clarified
  • the neutral theory classifies new mutations into discrete classes
  • in my theory, there is no clear-cut distinction among these classes and the borderline cases are assumed to be more important
  • the rate of amino acid substitution is higher in small populations in my theory
  • it is independent of population size in the strict neutral theory
  • my theory predicts that substitutions will be concentrated at the time of speciation, when small population size creates a "bottle neck"