near neutrality & compensatory evolution
Ohta T 1974 Mutational pressure as the main cause of molecular evolution and polymorphism. Nature 252:351-354.
- it becomes increasingly necessary to re-examine evolutionary theories
- in particular the orthodox neo-Darwinian view that the rate and direction of evolution are determined almost exclusively by positive natural selection
- it is probable that molecular evolution proceeds essentially by mutational pressure rather than by positive Darwinian selection
- this view is essentially an extension of the neutral mutation-random drift hypothesis of Kimura1 and King and Jukes2
- and takes into account the idea of "frozen accidents" proposed by Crick21 and Ohno22
- once the structure and function of a molecule are determined in the course of evolution, natural selection acts mainly to maintain them
- because all later evolutionary changes proceed under selective constraints
- natural selection then becomes mostly 'negative'
- positive Darwinian selection is only a minor part of both total selection and the total number of mutant substitutions
- if selection pressure is weak, a mutant allele, even if slightly deleterious, can occasionally replace the original allele by random drift
- such chance events are likely to be important in molecular evolution
- I have suggested before that the coupled base substitutions in the paired region of this molecule, in the course of evolution, represent a very slightly deleterious base substitution in the first stage
- followed by a slightly advantageous complementary base substitution
- this corresponds to Fitch's concomitantly variable codons (covarions)
- the majority of "nearly neutral" mutations is likely to be very slightly deleterious
- especially if the proteins and biochemical pathways are very highly organised
- and if environmental factors cannot interact directly with the primary structure of proteins
- the present hypothesis differs from the original neutral mutation-random drift hypothesis in emphasising a very small selection pressure
- in fact, it is an extended form of neutral theory, conceived as the lower limit of the selective process
- there should be no distinct borderline between deleterious and neutral, between deleterious and advantageous, or even between deleterious and overdominant mutations
- random genetic drift and mutational pressure play a much bigger part than has been believed
- we have already suggested from a comparison of actual observations with the results of our simulation experiments assuming stepwise production of neutral alleles, that there are more rare alleles than predicted form the strictly neutral hypothesis
- if we bring very slight negative selection into the model, the discrepancy between the observation and the simulation should disappear completely
- the recent analysis of Yamazaki and Maruyama42 needs re-examination in the light of this
- if the borderline cases between slightly deleterious and completely neutral mutations are important, as I assume here, then the population size becomes most crucial and the rate of evolution is higher in small populations
- the true pattern of molecular evolution and variation can only emerge from further investigation
- bearing in mind particularly the importance of intra-molecular organisation which derives from the polypeptide folding mechanism
- here ecological conditions are likely to be much less significant than has traditionally been supposed
- in the light of such considerations, the original concept of the integrated gene pool54 may have to be modified
- the distinction between the strict neutral theory and my theory should be clarified
- the neutral theory classifies new mutations into discrete classes
- in my theory, there is no clear-cut distinction among these classes and the borderline cases are assumed to be more important
- the rate of amino acid substitution is higher in small populations in my theory
- it is independent of population size in the strict neutral theory
- my theory predicts that substitutions will be concentrated at the time of speciation, when small population size creates a "bottle neck"